Sunday, September 13, 2026
There is a moment in almost every leadership career when experience stops being enough.
The habits that made you successful still work.
But not everywhere.
The way you managed a small team may not work with a larger organization.
The way you personally solved problems may become a bottleneck when others need room to lead.
The speed that once made you valuable may begin to reduce the quality of your thinking.
The confidence that helped you advance may make it harder to hear feedback.
And the knowledge you worked so hard to accumulate may create an unexpected problem:
You begin relying too heavily on what you already know.
Leadership development is often described as addition.
Learn another skill. Take another course. Read another book. Attend another seminar. Build another capability.
But senior leadership frequently requires something more difficult.
Subtraction.
Letting go of behaviors that once worked.
Creating space to think.
And turning knowledge into changed behavior.
Those three disciplines—adaptability, reflection and application—may determine whether an experienced leader continues growing or simply becomes more experienced at doing what worked before.
1. Your Next Level May Require You to Outgrow Your Previous One
Success creates confidence.
It should.
You earned it.
You solved problems. Delivered results. Built teams. Made difficult decisions. Learned an industry. Developed relationships.
Perhaps led a turnaround, launched a product, integrated an acquisition or built an operation from the ground up.
Those experiences become part of your leadership identity.
But identity can become attachment.
The Center for Creative Leadership has studied executive derailment for decades. One of its most consistent findings is that difficulty adapting to change is among the most important factors that can derail otherwise successful leaders. CCL describes adaptable executives as leaders able to adjust management style, revise plans, respond to changing external pressures and learn from feedback and mistakes.
Center for Creative Leadership — Adaptability
That is a critical distinction.
The problem is rarely that the leader suddenly became less intelligent.
The environment changed.
The role changed.
The organization changed.
But the leader did not change enough with it.
A strength can even become part of the problem.
The decisive executive becomes controlling.
The analytical leader becomes slow.
The relationship builder avoids difficult confrontation.
The operator continues personally solving problems that should now belong to the team.
The entrepreneurial founder struggles to create structure.
The process-oriented leader adds controls long after the organization needs more speed.
CCL’s research emphasizes that successful adaptation requires access to a broader range of behaviors rather than one preferred leadership response.
Center for Creative Leadership — Adaptable Leadership
That means leadership development is not simply asking:
“What am I good at?”
It also requires asking:
“Where has one of my strengths become too dominant?”
And:
“What part of the leader I was yesterday could limit the leader I need to become tomorrow?”
That question can be uncomfortable.
It should be.
Growth often begins when the leader stops defending an old version of success.
Promotions Change More Than the Title
Every significant increase in responsibility changes what the organization needs from the leader.
A frontline supervisor may create value by solving problems quickly.
A plant manager must increasingly build systems that allow other people to solve them.
A functional vice president needs to understand the enterprise beyond the boundaries of the function.
A COO must connect strategy, people, financial performance and operations across the organization.
A CEO must spend significant time looking beyond the company’s walls.
At every step, leadership becomes less about personally possessing the answer and more about creating the conditions under which the organization can find and execute the answer.
That transition requires deliberate adaptation.
CCL’s research with senior executives on change-capable leadership makes the point directly: leaders trying to lead meaningful organizational change need to begin by changing their own mindset, actions and behaviors.
Center for Creative Leadership — Change-Capable Leadership
That is one of the hardest realities of leadership.
It is easier to redesign an organization chart than yourself.
Easier to replace a process than a habit.
Easier to tell a team to change than to recognize that the team may be waiting for you to change first.
Sunday offers a useful opportunity to ask:
What does my current role require from me that my previous role did not?
And perhaps more importantly:
What does it require me to stop doing?
2. Protect Your Thinking Time Before Your Calendar Takes It Away
There is another obstacle to leadership development.
Time.
Senior executives rarely suffer from a shortage of things to do.
The opposite is usually true.
The calendar fills automatically.
Customer meetings. Operating reviews. Board preparation. Travel. Budget meetings. Performance discussions. Hiring. Emails. Calls. Escalations. Problem solving.
Something always appears more urgent than uninterrupted thinking.
That creates a dangerous illusion.
A full calendar feels productive.
But a full calendar does not necessarily reflect the highest-value use of executive time.
McKinsey surveyed nearly 1,400 executives at general-manager level or above and found that only 9% described themselves as very satisfied with how they allocated their time. Only 52% said their time allocation largely matched their organizations’ strategic priorities, and nearly half acknowledged that they were not spending enough time guiding strategic direction.
McKinsey & Company — Making Time Management the Organization’s Priority
Those findings are older, but the underlying leadership problem has hardly disappeared.
Executive time is a finite resource.
Yet organizations often manage financial capital with far more discipline than leadership attention.
A proposed capital project may need ROI, payback, risk analysis, strategic justification and approval.
But a recurring meeting can consume hundreds of executive hours every year simply because it was placed on the calendar five years ago.
McKinsey argues that leadership time should be treated as an organizational resource, not merely as an individual scheduling problem. The research recommends examining calendars, eliminating low-value meetings and deliberately creating space for strategic priorities and reflection.
That idea deserves more attention.
Your calendar is not simply a record of your commitments.
Your calendar is evidence of your priorities.
Look at last week.
Not what you intended to prioritize.
What actually received your time.
How many hours were devoted to thinking, customers, developing people, long-term strategy, understanding competitors, visiting operations, learning and reflection?
Versus status meetings, email, recurring reports, problems someone else could have solved and meetings where nothing was decided?
If there is a large gap between the strategy and the calendar, the calendar usually wins.
Thinking Is Work
One reason leaders fail to protect thinking time is cultural.
Thinking does not always look productive.
There is no obvious output.
No meeting. No presentation. No email. No immediate decision.
You may simply be sitting with a notebook. Walking. Reading. Looking at data. Asking yourself uncomfortable questions.
From the outside, nothing appears to be happening.
But some of the most important leadership work happens exactly there.
Harvard Business Review has argued that executives increasingly spend their time processing information, reacting and executing while sacrificing slower, more deliberate reflection—and that this can reduce the quality of thought required in complex environments.
Harvard Business Review — How to Regain the Lost Art of Reflection
This is not an argument for executives to spend their days contemplating abstract ideas while organizations wait for decisions.
Execution matters.
Speed matters.
Customers matter.
Results matter.
But there is a difference between speed and permanent reaction.
If every hour is committed, there is no capacity to connect the dots.
To ask whether a problem is actually the problem.
To notice patterns.
To challenge a long-held assumption.
To recognize that something important has changed.
A leader without thinking time eventually becomes dependent on whatever arrives next.
The next meeting determines the priority.
The newest email receives attention.
The loudest problem becomes urgent.
The organization begins managing the executive instead of the executive managing the organization.
That is why one of the simplest Sunday questions may also be one of the most revealing:
“When during my week do I actually have uninterrupted time to think?”
If the answer is “almost never,” that is not simply a calendar issue.
It is a leadership-design issue.
3. Stop Measuring Development by How Much You Know
There is a third problem.
Modern leaders have extraordinary access to information.
Books. Podcasts. Executive programs. Online courses. Newsletters. Research. Videos. Conferences. Coaches. Professional networks.
We can learn almost continuously.
That is valuable.
But information consumption can create another illusion.
Learning is not the same as development.
You can understand delegation intellectually and still micromanage.
You can study emotional intelligence and continue reacting defensively.
You can attend a communication workshop and continue dominating meetings.
You can read about coaching and continue giving everyone the answer.
You can understand strategy and continue filling the strategic plan with thirty priorities.
You can receive 360-degree feedback and explain why everybody misunderstood you.
The knowledge may be present.
The behavior is unchanged.
So what exactly was developed?
Reflection Turns Experience Into Learning
Research from Harvard Business School and collaborators provides a useful answer.
Giada Di Stefano, Francesca Gino, Gary Pisano and Bradley Staats studied whether people learn more effectively from experience when they deliberately reflect on it.
In a field experiment at a business-process outsourcing organization in India, employees who spent 15 minutes at the end of the day reflecting on what they had learned performed 23% better on a subsequent assessment than employees who simply continued working.
Harvard Business Review — Dear Diary…
Their broader research found that deliberate reflection can improve learning by helping individuals synthesize experience and strengthen their confidence in what they have learned.
Academy of Management — Learning by Thinking: How Reflection Aids Performance
Think about the implications for leadership.
Executives accumulate enormous amounts of experience.
But experience alone does not guarantee growth.
Twenty years of experience can mean twenty years of learning.
Or it can mean one year of learning repeated twenty times.
Reflection determines part of the difference.
After a difficult meeting: What actually happened? What did I contribute to the outcome? What signal did I miss? What did the other person need from me?
After a major decision: Which assumptions were correct? Which were wrong? What would I do differently?
After a failure: What should change in my behavior—not simply in the process?
After success: Was the result produced by good judgment, strong execution, favorable circumstances or luck?
Those questions convert activity into insight.
But there is one more step.
Insight must become action.
From Knowledge to Behavior
Leadership development becomes visible through changed behavior.
You listen differently. Delegate differently. Ask better questions. Respond to disagreement differently. Spend your time differently. Make decisions differently. Develop people differently. Handle pressure differently.
That is why Sunday reflection should not end with:
“What did I learn this week?”
Add two questions:
“What will I do differently because I learned it?”
“How will somebody else be able to tell that I changed?”
Those questions create accountability.
If nobody around you can observe the development, it may still be intellectual rather than behavioral.
This aligns with another important finding from CCL’s derailment research.
Leaders at risk are often not simply lacking feedback.
Some receive feedback repeatedly but fail to adapt their behavior. The inability or unwillingness to learn from mistakes, respond to feedback and adjust has long appeared in leadership-derailment research.
Center for Creative Leadership — Adaptable Leadership Research
That is why executive coaching, mentoring and development programs create value only when they eventually change what happens on Monday morning.
The course is not the development.
The book is not the development.
The assessment is not the development.
The coach is not the development.
The changed behavior is the development.
Everything else is an input.
The Three Disciplines Reinforce One Another
These three Sunday themes are not separate.
They form a cycle.
Adaptability tells you that the leader must change.
Thinking time creates the space to recognize what needs to change.
Reflection and application convert experience into changed behavior.
Remove any one of them and development becomes harder.
Without adaptability, the leader defends the past.
Without thinking time, the leader remains trapped in reaction.
Without behavioral application, learning remains theoretical.
Together they create something much more powerful:
A leader capable of continuously reinventing how he or she creates value.
That capability is increasingly important because leadership environments do not remain static.
Teams change. Technology changes. Markets change. Generations change. Businesses grow. Businesses contract. Responsibilities expand.
What worked before remains useful experience.
But it cannot become a prison.
A Sunday Leadership Audit
Before Monday arrives, take thirty quiet minutes.
No email.
No phone.
No meeting.
A notebook is enough.
Ask yourself:
What behavior helped me get here but may not help me get where I am going?
Where did I spend my time last week—and does that reflect what I claim is important?
What did I learn recently that has actually changed the way I lead?
Then choose one behavior.
Not ten.
One.
Perhaps: Listen without interrupting. Delegate a decision you normally keep. Remove one recurring meeting. Create ninety minutes of uninterrupted thinking time. Ask someone for feedback and resist explaining yourself. Spend time with a customer. Coach instead of solve. Read about something outside your function. Write down what you learned from one difficult decision.
Small changes become significant when repeated.
Leadership growth rarely announces itself dramatically.
It appears quietly in what you begin doing differently.
Our Perspective
At EGBS — ENLOSA: Global Business Solutions, we believe leadership development is not primarily about accumulating knowledge.
It is about increasing capacity.
The capacity to adapt.
The capacity to think.
The capacity to learn from experience.
The capacity to change behavior.
The capacity to lead successfully when the conditions that produced yesterday’s success no longer exist.
Experience matters enormously.
But experience becomes most valuable when leaders remain willing to question it.
A career should give us more than answers.
It should give us better questions.
So as another week begins, consider one:
Am I becoming the leader my next challenge will require—or simply becoming more efficient at being the leader I already am?
Your next level may not require more hours.
It may not require another credential.
It may not even require more knowledge.
It may require a different version of you.
And creating that version begins with something leadership calendars too rarely protect:
Time to think.
Time to reflect.
And the willingness to change what happens next.
Because ultimately:
Learning creates knowledge.
Reflection creates understanding.
Behavior creates growth.
And leadership development becomes real when other people can experience the difference.
ENLOSA: Global Business Solutions
Strategy. Leadership. Execution.
enlosa@enlosa.com | +1 (877) 246-1109
References
- Center for Creative Leadership — Adaptability and Executive Derailment. CCL’s long-running leadership research identifies difficulty adapting to change as a major derailment risk and emphasizes flexibility, feedback and behavioral adjustment as important leadership capabilities. Source
- Center for Creative Leadership — Change-Capable Leadership. Research with nearly 300 senior executives emphasizes that successfully leading change begins with changes in the leader’s own mindset, actions and behaviors. Source
- McKinsey & Company — “Making Time Management the Organization’s Priority.” Research involving nearly 1,400 executives examined the disconnect between executive time allocation and strategic priorities and recommends treating leadership time as a finite organizational resource. Source
- Harvard Business School — “Reflecting on Work Improves Job Performance.” Research by Giada Di Stefano, Francesca Gino, Gary Pisano and Bradley Staats found that deliberate reflection improved learning and performance in experimental and field settings. Source
- Harvard Business Review — “Dear Diary…” The research reported that employees who spent 15 minutes reflecting at the end of the workday during training performed 23% better on a subsequent assessment. Source
- Academy of Management / Di Stefano, Pisano & Staats — “Learning by Thinking: How Reflection Aids Performance.” The research explores how intentionally synthesizing experience through reflection strengthens learning beyond experience alone. Source
- Harvard Business Review — “How to Regain the Lost Art of Reflection.” The article argues that constant information processing and reaction can crowd out the deliberative thinking leaders need in complex environments. Source
#SundayGrowth, #LeadershipDevelopment, #ExecutiveLeadership, #ContinuousLearning, #SelfDevelopment, #Reflection, #Adaptability, #ExecutiveCoaching, #Leadership, #PersonalGrowth, #EGBS
Leave a Reply